Nerman Fatic vs Tomas Farjat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Sep at 05:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs T. Farjat

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Farjat
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Tomas Farjat winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Tomas Farjat was at the M25 Zlatibor, 25-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fatic | 1 |
| Farjat | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Zlatibor(09-25-25)
N. Fatic vs T. Farjat H2H Profile
N. Fatic vs T. Farjat Match Preview:
- In recent months, Tomas Farjat has performed slightly better on second serve points, achieving a 45.12% win rate compared to Nerman Fatic's 43.87%. Could this edge on the second serve prove crucial in a tight match?
- Nerman Fatic excels in returning first serves, capturing 28.98% of points, higher than Farjat's 24.08%. This strength could influence break opportunities during the match.
- When it comes to returning an opponent's second serve, Farjat has a clear advantage, with a success rate of 51.77% compared to Fatic's 43.74%. How might this affect the momentum?
- Both players display nearly identical resilience under pressure, with Fatic saving 55.87% of breakpoints against Farjat's 55.84%. Such consistency might see them evenly matched during crucial moments.
- In terms of overall match victories over the past year, Fatic holds a significant edge, winning 75.00% of his matches, whereas Farjat has won 47.62%. Does Fatic's recent track record make him the favorite?
- Fatic's best performances have been on clay, winning 61% of matches, while Farjat's best surface is indoor hard courts with a 75% win rate. What impact will surface preference have in this match?
- This year, Fatic has competed in higher-level tournaments (Challengers/ITF) with a 66.67% win rate, as opposed to Farjat's experience predominantly at the Future/Satellite level (52% win rate). Will the competition level play a role in their meeting?
- Fatic has played against slightly lower-ranked opponents on average. Conversely, having faced higher-ranked competitors, Farjat's experience could work to his advantage.
- Dominantly, Fatic wins 94% of his deciding sets, compared to Farjat's 40%. Could resilience in crucial moments tip the scale in Fatic's favor?
- Current event form and venue performances often serve as valuable indicators; players tend to have particular events where they excel.
Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Nerman Fatic and Tomas Farjat presents an intriguing contest of strengths and weaknesses. While Farjat has shown proficiency on the second serve and success against higher-ranked opponents, his performance in deciding sets and overall win rate in the past year lacks the consistency observed in Fatic's record.
Fatic's ability to perform under pressure, clearly illustrated by his high winning percentage in deciding sets, as well as his effective return on first serves, highlights him as a formidable opponent in crucial game moments. Additionally, his experience in higher-level tournaments gives him an edge when facing competitive challenge.
Considering the data and recent trends, Nerman Fatic appears to be the most likely winner in this match, owing to his demonstrated resilience and superior overall performance in recent history.
Nerman Fatic vs Tomas Farjat Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fatic vs T. Farjat H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:12:3 | Average Match Time | 1:12:3 |
| 54% (36/67) | 1st Serve % | 70% (37/53) |
| 69% (25/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (23/37) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 47% (25/53) | Return Points Win % | 39% (26/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
T. Farjat Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||

N. Fatic vs T. Farjat Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.49% (403/286) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.35% (199/148) |
| 57.51% (888/656) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.45% (434/363) |
| 53.04% (7574/6706) | Games Win/Loss | 51.34% (3894/3690) |
| 51.19% (43/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.54% (32/20) |
| 61.00% (341/218) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.36% (164/127) |
| 43.18% (19/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 1568 | Aces Total | 1403 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1510 | Total Double Faults | 790 |
| 1:19:52 | Average Match Time | 1:14:35 |
| 509.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 362.57 |
| 66% (23679/35628) | 1st Serve % | 57% (10859/19054) |
| 65% (15504/23679) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (7618/10859) |
| 48% (5733/11949) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3771/8195) |
| 47% (1961/4201) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (727/1790) |
| 43% (15552/35990) | Return Points Win % | 39% (7245/18517) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.91% (118/105) | Challenger W/L | 50.67% (38/37) |
| 63.24% (277/161) | Futures W/L | 59.19% (161/111) |
| 60% (394/661) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (190/338) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 51% (79/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (50/99) |
| 54% (102/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (64/108) |
| 88% (393/347) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (173/153) |
| 11% (393/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (173/19) |
| 19% (296/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (174/44) |